The rise of PTAB discretionary denial is changing how companies protect their intellectual property. Today, the PTAB denial rate has reached 72%, especially in cases with parallel district court litigation. Because of this, companies are now changing their patent defense strategy. A big part of this shift is the growing focus on IPR vs EPR.
Peach State Tech
Tech Company
PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) discretionary denial happens when the patent office refuses to review a case. This can happen even if the unpatentability challenge is strong.
The decision depends on several discretionary factors, such as:
These are part of the discretionary denial framework used by the United States patent system.
The rising PTAB denial rate is linked to changes in how the trademark office manages cases.
Key reasons include:
There are also new interim processes and a new bifurcated process that affect how AIA proceedings are handled.
Recent updates from leadership, including Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart, have introduced a new discretionary denial framework. This framework changes how discretionary denial arguments are reviewed.
The debate around IPR vs EPR is now more important than ever.
Because of these differences, many companies now prefer EPR as part of their patent defense strategy.
Companies are adjusting to the new discretionary denial process by:
This shift helps companies protect their patent rights without wasting resources.
Several legal elements influence outcomes in PTAB proceedings:
In some cases, exceptional circumstances like national security or public health concerns may also play a role.
Recent significant changes in policy have reshaped the system.
Leaders like Director Coke Morgan Stewart have influenced:
These updates aim to balance fairness, efficiency, and the appropriate use of office resources.
For every patent owner, this shift is important.
High denial rates mean:
Using EPR can help reduce risk, especially when dealing with parallel district court litigation.
Yes. As of 2026, there are clearer and more structured guidelines for PTAB discretionary denial. These updates aim to make decisions more consistent and easier to understand. The patent office has refined how cases are reviewed, especially those involving parallel litigation and IPR petitions.
The PTAB now follows a more defined process when applying discretionary considerations.
This helps companies better predict whether their case will be accepted or denied.
Cases with parallel litigation are still a major reason for denial.
However, in 2026:
This means timing is now very important when filing IPR petitions.
The PTAB continues to improve workload management.
To do this, it:
This helps reduce delays and improve efficiency.
In 2026, strong prior art is even more important.
Cases with clear and solid evidence are more likely to move forward.
Weak or unclear arguments are more likely to face PTAB discretionary denial.
The system is still evolving. Recent updates and recent decisions show that the PTAB is trying to:
In 2026, companies must be more strategic than ever.
To reduce risk:
Understanding these updates can help you avoid denial and choose the best path—especially when deciding between IPR vs EPR.
The rise of PTAB discretionary denial is changing the rules.
With the PTAB denial rate at 72%, companies must rethink their approach. The shift from IPR to EPR is not just a trend—it is a smarter patent defense strategy.
Understanding IPR vs EPR helps businesses:
In today’s legal environment, success depends on choosing the right path early.
As PTAB discretionary denial rates reshape how companies approach patent challenges, the need for visibility, credibility, and strategic positioning has never been greater.
Peach State Tech helps founders, startups, and innovators share their stories—so the right investors, partners, and industry leaders are paying attention when it matters most.
If your company is navigating patent litigation, refining its patent defense strategy, or making key decisions like IPR vs EPR, your story deserves to be seen.
Get featured and connect with Georgia’s growing tech community.
Peach State Tech
Tech Company
Connecting Georgia’s tech ecosystem with investors, entrepreneurs, and decision-makers.
Enjoyed this post?
AI image generator bias is forcing creative teams to rethink how they build visual campaigns, because while tools powered by generative AI can produce striking visuals in seconds, they often default to outdated stereotypes without the right direction. In Atlanta, where diverse communities and minority-owned businesses play a major role in the local economy, that disconnect is especially noticeable, prompting creative agencies across the city to develop new workflows that ensure AI-generated content reflects real audiences rather than patterns inherited from old training data.
MyMobileLyfe has partnered with business consultant Teri R. Moten to launch an AI implementation training initiative designed for Georgia’s mid-market businesses. The program focuses on practical, human-centric AI training for organizations that need structured guidance but do not have enterprise-level budgets or internal AI teams. At a time when artificial intelligence is reshaping how companies approach growth, the partnership reflects a broader push to build stronger AI skills around real business use cases.
The OpenAI Sora shutdown is about more than one app. It reflects the growing tension between generative AI, business realities, and legal scrutiny. For Georgia’s film and tech sectors, it shows how even a promising AI model can run into trouble when cost, trust, and intellectual property concerns become too big to ignore.
Some technologies grow in importance not because they are highly visible, but because they quietly solve complex operational problems in better ways. In Georgia, electronic monitoring technology is starting to follow that path, evolving from traditional monitoring devices into more connected systems that support public safety, compliance, and accountability.
Some technology categories gain attention because they are new. Others become important because they solve long-standing operational challenges. In Georgia, community supervision technology is increasingly falling into the second category, as agencies look for better ways to manage workflows, improve visibility, and support public safety within the broader criminal justice system.
Public-sector software rarely gets the same startup attention as fintech, cybersecurity, or health innovation, but it has a direct impact on how supervision programs, officers, and courts operate. That is what makes Talitrix worth watching as a Georgia justice-tech startup. In this post, we break down 10 reasons this Georgia justice-tech startup stands out, from its T-Band wearable and Talitrix Score to its supervisor tools, and broader case-management services.